Category Archives: Leadership

We All Should Be So Angry

This morning I heard a radio clip of Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed getting angry during a board meeting. He and the board were discussing how to save money and balance the budget.  The mayor got angry because Board members were insinuating that he would wants reduce city employee pensions. But in the clip (which I can’t find) the mayor goes on to say that reforming the employee pension program could save the city millions of dollars and that the budget HAS to be balanced. Between the lines: We gotta find the money somewhere, and there’s a big pile of it hiding under those ridiculous [my word] pensions.

As I listened to the “angry clip” and the accompanying news cast, I shook my head and smiled. Over the past (almost) year and the summer of 2009 that I’ve spent in the Atlanta area, I have heard similar (and worse) news casts about then Mayor Shirley Franklin.  Mayor Franklin got a lot of flack about being angry, confrontational and mean to the press.  The flack is warranted, Mayor Shirley was angry.  But I believe she had every right to be.

Atlanta, like governments and business around the world, is facing tremendous financial insecurity.  Money is tight (and getting tighter). Leaders are in the precarious position of having to make unpopular decisions about what programs stay and what programs need to be cut to keep the bohemeth afloat.

During her years as mayor, Ms. Franklin was no newbie to budgetary shortfalls. When she was elected, Atlanta had a budget deficit that she reversed by enacting an unpopular tax increase. Unfortunately, the recession has placed a dark light on Mayor Franklin’s budgetary prowess.  I remember watching the news months ago as Mayor Franklin gave very clear and rational cost cutting and saving recommendations to City Countil and the public.  I remember her saying something very similar to what Mayor Reed said this morning: No one wants to make cuts, but the budget has to be balanced. Spending has to stop. City Council balked from her recommendation, at least in part because several of them were up for re-election and at least two of them wanted to run for Franklin’s role.  [This is why I HATE the strong mayor system, but that’s for another day, another post,].

I never blamed Mayor Franklin for being angry, she was making hard, unpopular decisions and she was under a lot of pressure. One doesn’t need an MPA to realize that if money is short, something has to give. The decision of what goes and what stays isn’t an easy one, but those decisions are EXACTLY what elected officials in strong mayor cities are elected to make.

I was frustrated right along with Mayor Franklin when she couldn’t get a consensus of city council members to collaborate on solutions to keep Atlanta out of the red. It was like they preferred to do nothing, rather than do something that stepped on someone pet project.

Based on the time that Mayor Franklin had with her council, I wasn’t surprised to hear that City Council already turning on Mayor Reed. I’m glad he did not let their gibes slide.

My advice to Mayor Reed? Have a clear, rational decision making process, keep the public informed on what you’re doing and why, don’t shy away from making the hard decisions, and feel free to call your city council out when they lock you down.  And please, don’t be afraid to get angry. Altanta has big problems, and we should all be angry at inaction or worse, elected officials with their heads in the sand who’d rather point fingers than do something.

Beware the Bitter Bureaucrat: A Cautionary Tale and a PSA

When I was in MPA School I had to complete an organizational blueprint for a public entity.  Because of my interest in community and economic development, my professor assigned me to a state agency whose mission is to “assist local governments with economic development, community development, growth management and downtown revitalization”.

Even though I was a local government and non-profit junkie with no interest in working for a state government, I was excited about the opportunity because their mission seemed so closely aligned with what I wanted to do. I scheduled time to visit with different layers of the organization’s bureaucracy. I talked to the department and divisions “higher-ups” as well as section chiefs and analysts. I set up one-on-one conversations and gave each person the confidentiality that they needed to tell me their true experience working in their organization using Bolman and Deal’s organizational frames: Structural, Human Resources, Symbolic, and Political frames. (Shout-Out to Org Theory!!)

It didn’t take me long to figure out that the organization was toxic from the top to the bottom. Communication, up down and through the hierarchy was broken. Employees felt that they had been back-stabbed by their bosses—they got blamed for mistakes but never the credit for triumphs. Output was stale. Feelings had been hurt and old resentments had been allowed to fester. Unproductive employees had been moved around rather than fired, and their presence was a drain on everyone else. There was no friendly camaraderie around the water cooler or any activities to make the organization come together to celebrate in a meaningful way.  Most employees felt powerless, and came into work every day marking the hours until they could go home each evening.

In spite of these conditions, most employees cared deeply about the mission of the organization and about their individual work. Unfortunately, that didn’t help company morale. Meeting employees in the hallways was quiet and awkward at best and in some cases it was downright hostile and unfriendly.

Over the course of that semester, I learned that the people in that organization will likely stay in their current job (or one very similar), surrounded by people that they do not like or respect for 10, 20, sometimes 30 years. I interviewed people who were counting the years to retirement and were unwilling to even consider finding a job that suited them better. Over and over I heard about the perks of the job. The 401k match, the 2 weeks of vacation time, the flexible schedule, and the promotion schedule were all touted as reasons to stay. I remember thinking to myself that no amount of vacation was worth being miserable for the rest of the year.

Not only would they not consider quitting jobs that they hated, they weren’t even willing to consider ways to make the job better. They were all content to work (unhappily) for an organization, notice and complain about the problems and issues but not ever do ANYTHING that would make the problem go away. They wouldn’t even consult higher levels of the hierarchy about them. It was like they were stuck in purgatory. Or just stuck.

By the end of the assignment I knew that I never, ever wanted to work for a state government and I had a new appreciation for the term bureaucrat.

In my current position, almost 2 years later, I can confirm that my first impression of state government employees is by and large a correct one. As far as I could tell, state government (in any state) is full of bitter bureaucrats.

Bitter bureaucrats:   While mostly found at the state level of government, bitter bureaucrats can invade any organization.  Bitter bureaucrats can be identified by their constantly frowning faces, and the inability to make eye contact or say a friendly word with their co-workers. Bitter Bureaucrats can usually be found whining and complaining about a process or problem concerning their work flow but refuse to do anything that may alleviate their problem. Beware of Bitter Bureaucrats as they drain the life out of other staff members and organization projects. Bitter Bureaucrats have the incapacity to try new things, create change, or think outside the box or form.

Bitter Bureaucrats are not born. They are made. They get Bitter Bureaucrat Syndrome.

Symptoms of Bitter Bureaucrat Syndrome are: Unproductivity in the workplace, constant taking of “mental health days”, overwhelming feelings of complacency, stagnation, and being in a rut.

You may be at risk for contracting Bitter Bureaucrat Syndrome if: you feel that your boss only gives you negative feedback, the creativity is being beat out of you, you are being asked to conform to a out-dated standard in some way, you are told to do things the way they have always been done, your boss and co-workers have been in their current jobs longer than you’ve been alive, you live in a cube, you are never congratulated for creating a new process or trying a novel concept or if you have 3 or more different company policy manuals in your personal work space.

The fastest and best cure for bitter bureaucrat syndrome in individuals is for the afflicted person to quit the organization that caused the outbreak and find/do work that supports and nurtures in some vital way. Organizationally, the cure for bitter bureaucrat syndrome is to create a new culture. The organization must be purged of complacency, negativity, and conformity and a new culture of creativity and friendliness and open communication must be established.

Pass this along to all those you know who are in danger of becoming a bitter bureaucrat and to those who have been guilty of creating bitter bureaucrats.

Social Media for Governments: An Explanation (Part Two)

How would my organization use Twitter and other social media tools?

Would you like to be able to quickly inform and update the community of fire emergencies in the area?

Twitter can help you do that. Check out the Los Angeles Fire Department and the Napa City Fire Department.

Print screen captured 9/20/2009

Print screen captured 9/20/2009

Here is another article about how the fire department uses Twitter.  I especially like this quote

“Instead, “having this Web 2.0 presence … allows us to listen more clearly and more accurately over a greater area,” he said.”It is all about getting much more feedback [from the public].”

And these aren’t the only agencies using twitter. Law enforcement all over the country is turning to social media. And the premier local management association uses Twitter to reach a larger audience and update its members.

Do you need help crafting a social media strategy?

Things I’ve Learned at Work: Technology is our friend

In my current work, I’m a management consultant and internal performance auditor for a state agency.  Simply put, I analyze existing state programs and service functions; I investigate their strengths and weaknesses, and identify strategies that can help them to be the best they can be.

I love my job.  Finding ways to make stuff better is a part of my natural make up. It’s just what I do.

I’ve been on this job for about a month now. And the program that I’ve evaluating is full of problems.  But in talking to its employees, I quickly realized that it is has not always been this way.  Back in the day, this particular program was STATE OF THE ART.  So what has happened over the years?

Nothing.  Nothing has happened.  Nothing has CHANGED. They do things today, very much like they were done 25 years ago.  They’ve half-assed implemented pieces of technology, but their business processes have not changed to reflect new technologies, or changes in population growth, or an increase in business requests.

Of course, this is a bad idea.

Technology is our friend.  Say it with me. Technology is our friend. However, it is important to recognize that the implementation of technology should change the way business is conducted.

One of the major recommendations that I’m going to make to the program that I’m analyzing is to match your business needs with your technology functions.  If you need to enter data, make sure that your technology makes data entry easier.  If you need to search for data, have a well developed search function.  If you need to preserve data, have adequate back-ups (electronic or some other form). If you need to communicate with an audience, make sure that you have the technology in place to make your communication efforts strong ones.

Know what you do, and let your business processes guide your technology decisions. Technology can help improve the way you do business. Understand that implementing new technologies should spark changes in your processes.  Things should not stay the same.