<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Cosmopolitan Urbanist &#187; housing finance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/tag/housing-finance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com</link>
	<description>Ideas, People, Communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 14:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>I blame HGTV</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/2009/09/03/i-blame-hgtv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/2009/09/03/i-blame-hgtv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>monicarolevans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HGTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I have a confession.
	 I started looked at real estate.  What? It wasn’t all me, I have a partner in crime to help me out here. And SHE was filling my inbox with all these really great listings for sell. 
	 At first it was, “Let’s look at these foreclosures “fixer uppers” in poor “up and coming” neighborhoods.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have a confession.</p>
	<p> I started looked at real estate.  What? It wasn’t all me, I have a partner in crime to help me out here. And SHE was filling my inbox with all these really great listings for sell. </p>
	<p> At first it was, “Let’s look at these <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">foreclosures</span> “fixer uppers” in <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">poor</span> “up and coming” neighborhoods.  We were thinking that we’d buy a property for +/- $60,000 and we figured we’d need about $50,000 to do proper restoration and renovations.  Then we had to come to terms with the fact that lots of those homes have electrical, roofing, plumbing, we-might-have-to-replace-everything kinds of problems and neither of us is prepared to take that on. Besides, we don’t really have to capital (otherwise, I’d buy one in a heartbeat). </p>
	<p> (aside: If anyone wants to sponsor me, I really want to buy <a href="http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/559-Pryor-St-Sw-Unit-4_Atlanta_GA_30312_1104041347">this one</a>. Email me, I have some really cool ideas on what to do with it.)</p>
	<p> So we progressed to looking small-ish condos that might need a little cosmetic work.  We started looking in the $100,000 price range and were prepared to spend an additional $20,000 on updates. Things like updating the kitchen cabinets and appliances, adding in hardwood floors, update the lighting and other fixtures, and doing some painting. Still we were skittish.</p>
	<p> Now we’ve started looking at turn-key townhomes. Now we’re looking in the $130,000’s (still relatively low) and I must say, even when I go into these homes that are pretty updated, I’m still thinking of all the things I’d change and  how the past owners had the worst taste ever. Why do people still put up wall paper and carpet in the bathroom? </p>
	<p> I love houses. I love house hunting, even when I’m just looking at the pictures of the listings from my computer.  And I love to do drive-bys to see if the different neighborhoods are places I’d like to live. And with the low (and still falling) home prices and the still skyrocketing number of foreclosures, and the <a href="http://www.federalhousingtaxcredit.com/2009/faq.php">government money</a> that’s available (‘til Dec 1) for home buyers. I wonder how many other new young home buyers are entering the market?</p>
	<p> Thoughts?</p>
	<p> <strong><em>***We do not take responsibility for this speculative behavior.  We blame HGTV’s wonderful line-up of design and home-buying shows. I truly believe that I could be an amazing home flipper.</em></strong>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/2009/09/03/i-blame-hgtv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE best explanation of the credit crisis that I&#8217;ve seen.</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/2009/08/11/the-best-explanation-of-the-credit-crisis-that-ive-seen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/2009/08/11/the-best-explanation-of-the-credit-crisis-that-ive-seen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>monicarolevans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unintended consequences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I&#8217;ve heard everyone- professors, media,  finance people, government officials, non-profit leaders (all with their many-armed diagrams)  try to explain how the housing/credit crisis all started.   Best case scenario, those presentations are boring.  Worst case scenario, they leave you more confused than when you started!
	Today, I discovered this video, done by a graduate student, explaining [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve heard everyone- professors, media,  finance people, government officials, non-profit leaders (all with their many-armed diagrams)  try to explain how the housing/credit crisis all started.   Best case scenario, those presentations are boring.  Worst case scenario, they leave you more confused than when you started!</p>
	<p>Today, I discovered this video, done by a graduate student, explaining the crisis.</p>
	<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/3261363">It is the best explanation that I&#8217;ve seen</a>.</p>
	<p>For more information on Jonathan, check out <a href="http://jonathanjarvis.com/">his website</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/2009/08/11/the-best-explanation-of-the-credit-crisis-that-ive-seen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uses for Neighborhood Stabilization Funds: A Reaction</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/2009/05/11/uses-for-neighborhood-stabilization-funds-a-reaction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/2009/05/11/uses-for-neighborhood-stabilization-funds-a-reaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>monicarolevans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[community development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low income housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhood stabilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unintended consequences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent report done by Enterprise Community Partners found that communities are going a good job of finding creative way to utilize Neighborhood Stabilization funds.

The San Francisco Chronicle wrote an article about the report's findings.  I must say that I am impressed with the different ways the report said that communities are using the funds, however, some of them can still be problematic.  Let's take them one by one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A recent <a href="http://www.enterprisecommunity.org/resources/publications_catalog/pdfs/nsp_2009.pdf">report</a> done by <a href="http://www.enterprisecommunity.org/">Enterprise Community Partners</a> found that communities are going a good job of finding creative way to utilize <a href="http://www.nls.gov/offices/cpd/communitydevelopment/programs/neighborhoodspg/">Neighborhood Stabilization</a> funds.</p>
	<p>The <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/09/BUSV17062G.DTL&amp;type=business">San Francisco Chronicle</a> wrote an article about the report&#8217;s findings.  I must say that I am impressed with the different ways the report said that communities are using the funds, however, some of them can still be problematic.  Let&#8217;s take them one by one.</p>
	<p>-<strong>Purchase and rehabilitation of foreclosed homes to be used for low-income housing</strong>: Before any money should be allocated to purchasing and rehabbing homes for low income families, I want to know where these homes are located.  Are these home in the far out suburbs where the nearest Food Lion is 10 miles away, and families need to have cars to get anywhere? Are these homes that were build on the edges of towns where the land was cheap and vulnerable homeowners were promised that commercial businesses and other developments would follow them out there? </p>
	<p>I wonder if these homes are near dependable public transit? Are these homes near good jobs, schools, day care, grocery stores? If they aren&#8217;t then they are useless, and shouldn&#8217;t be marketed to low income families.  Without good support services, housing a family in the middle of nowhere is stupid.</p>
	<p>-<strong>Assisting low-income buyers with home financing</strong>: I&#8217;m about to say something controversial, and I hope you still like me when I&#8217;ve said it.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Everyone<strong> </strong>does not need to be a homeowner.</span>  I understand that down payments, closing costs and other fees that must be paid upfront are what is keeping us from buying into the American dream, but for others of us, we just flat out don&#8217;t make enough money to be homeowners.  Unless our monthly mortgage payments are subsidized, we would never be able to afford a home.  (Maybe this is what this program does, I don&#8217;t know for sure).</p>
	<p>If this program is subsidizing mortgage payments, and is allowing low income families to own property in nice, attractive, desirable neighborhoods in good school districts, with adequate support services, then I think this is an awesome program.  But if this program will likely turn into a revolving door of residents who can&#8217;t afford their mortgages because have bitten off more than they can chew, then I think it is unduly setting people up to fail.</p>
	<p><strong>-Redeveloping foreclosed properties and vacant land for other purposes:</strong> I love this idea.  I believe that many of the foreclosed properties (I&#8217;m imagining those cul de sac developments on the edge of town, in sprawling metropolis with no sense of community) shouldn&#8217;t have been built in the first place.  At the very least, commercial districts and greenspace could be included to simulate a village environment.</p>
	<p><strong>-Demolition of blighted structures</strong>: I&#8217;m imaging neighborhoods that I driven through in inner city Atlanta when I visit my little sister in college.  I see block after block of blighted, empty, boarded up, unattractive, condemnable homes.  I remember thinking (and likely saying out loud) that the city should move all the people out and blow up this neighborhood. Sometimes there are very few or no redeemable qualities about a neighborhood, and the best thing is to get rid of everything and start over or return simply it to nature.  Also see my <a href="http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/2009/05/04/got-shrinkage/">Shrinking Cities</a> article.</p>
	<p>-<strong>Buying and holding foreclosed properties for later rehab or redevelopment</strong>: One question. So what do these neighborhoods look like in the meantime? A war zone? Who maintains these properties in the interim to insure that neighbors who stick around aren&#8217;t left with declining home values?</p>
	<p><strong>Bottom line people:</strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> Think about the best interests of the people you are serving and be aware of unintended consequences.  Just because there is lots of housing available doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s the right kind of housing for low income families. Just because a solution solves a problem doesn&#8217;t mean it doesn&#8217;t make another problem worse.</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cosmopolitanurbanist.com/2009/05/11/uses-for-neighborhood-stabilization-funds-a-reaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
